Skip to main content

The standards for genius have certainly changed....

... if Matt Groening and George Soros outrank Steven Hawking.

That's what a poll of 4,000 Britons conducted by the Telegraph found, anyway.

The number one genius slot was tied between Albert Hoffman (creator of LSD) and computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee. However, since Hoffman died in April, and the poll was to count only living geniuses, Hoffman was technically disqualified.

Berners-Lee, if you have never heard of him, was the fellow attributed the major share of the creation of the World-wide Web.

Here are the top ten, along with my selected highlights from later in the list:

1 (tie) Tim Berners-Lee and Albert Hoffman
3 George Soros
4 Matt Groening
5 (tie) Nelson Mandela and Frederick Sanger
7 (tie) Dario Fo and Steven Hawking
9 (tie) Oscar Niemeyer, Philip Glass, and Grigory Perelman

Quick--how many of the top ten have you actually heard of?

Would you have thought that creating the Simpsons qualified you to be ranked the world's fourth greatest living genius?

Here are other interesting selections:

Richard Dawkins and Rupert Murdoch were among those tied for number 25.

Prince, Noam Chomsky, and several others tied for number 32.

Mohammed Ali, Bill Gates, and Osama bin Laden were among those tied for number 43.

Brian Wilson (of Beach Boys fame) tied with Henry Kissinger and several others for number 49.

Dolly Parton (I can't make this shit up) was in a multi-way tie for the 97th greatest living genius in the world.

Jolene, Jolene, Jolene, Jo-lene, I'm begging of you please, don't take my man....

I know that every time I hear it, I think, pure f**king genius.

Waldo, I know, will realize that only his recent death probably kept John Mortimer off the list--and, frankly, comparing Rumpole of the Old Bailey to the Accidental Death of an Anarchist, it's pretty obvious that standards of literary acclaim are ... somewhat different in Europe.

Dolly Parton?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici