Skip to main content

Our largest creditor demands a new global currency: bring on the black helicopters and the North American Union

From Al Jazeera:

The head of the Chinese central bank has called for a new global currency controlled by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), saying such a move would give governments particularly in the developing world the ability to manage their economies more efficiently.

In an online essay Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the People's Bank of China, said the global financial crisis had exposed the danger of relying on one nation's currency for international payments.

The essay, released on the bank's website late on Monday, did not mention the US dollar by name, but the vast majority of international finance is carried out in dollars.

The comments come ahead of a major meeting of leaders from the Group of 20 major economies in London which will focus on measures to alleviate the global economic crisis.

During the meeting, beginning on April 2, China is expected to call for developing economies to have a bigger say in global finance and step up pressure for changes to a system dominated by the US dollar and Western governments.

The unusual step of publishing Zhou's essay in both Chinese and English versions is seen as indicating his comments are aimed at an international audience ahead of the G20 meeting.

China has become increasingly assertive in economic issues and while the global financial crisis has hit Chinese export industries hard, its leaders are also viewing the crisis as a potential opportunity to increase China's global clout.


Here's a safe bet: President Obama will not dismiss this out of hand, but call for discussion and study.

Comments

David said…
It should be very concerning. It is a vote of non confidence. The sad part is that they have a valid point. The world shouldn't suffer from our current fiscal insanity.
Anonymous said…
The world will continue to gravitate toward the most reliable currency. I would guess that we have about four years, Obama's first term, to demonstrate that we are putting our house back in order, following several decades of decline, thus validating China's investment in our paper. I'm sure Obama is concerned.

It should also be noted that China is part of our problem, in that they arbitrarily hold the value of their currency virtually constant, thus vastly favoring their export business, especially to the US. They also have massive pollution problems and horrible working conditions for their people, of little concern to our corporations as judged by the outflow of American jobs to China and others in the East.

The lowest price carries with it the cost of unintended consequences like pollution, poor working conditions, sacrifices of human rights, and loss of domestic jobs. Our government must have a voice against these problems.

Under laissez faire economics, we have been heading in the same direction as China, wrt neglecting pollution issues, neglecting workplace health concerns, and developing a highly stratified society with the bulk of the wealth in the upper several percent of the population. A more balanced government - business relationship is required to save us from ourselves.

I think President Obama understands this well, as his recovery programs include addressing these issues, to the consternation of those who would beat on him in order to push forward ideologies that have been demonstrated to be flawed in terms of practical, more desirable results for the average American family.

Perry Hood
Anonymous said…
You forgot to close the talking points playbook at the conclusion of your last comment, Perry.
Delaware Watch said…
But Obama did dismiss it out of hand last night during his press conference. When asked if he thinks the world needs a world currency he said "No." End of discussion.
Tyler Nixon said…
No Dana. He said "I don't believe that there's a need for a global currency."

Adding "at this time" would have completed this hedge.

So it is hardly a resounding 'no'.

As we know, Obama's "belief" could change as easily as the rest of his positions.

Also, what does anyone expect the POTUS to say?

Personally I would have expected a more resounding statement of confidence in the U.S. dollar.

So, hardly "end of discussion."
Anonymous said…
Jason Scott (queue Hube) and I have every-so-often been predicting the North American Union since about mid-'06. It's gonna happen, or some whacked out "official" synergy plan that will lock Mexico-US-Canada as a unit, while recognizing what will effectively be superficial borders on a map. I just want some duty-free AUTHENTIC tacos with some griddled fatback. Is that so wrong?

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici