Skip to main content

You'll have to find the money clause here yourself . . .

. . . because I'm not going to put it in bold print or anything for you.

For years the Southern Poverty Law Center has been issuing alerts about "hate groups" in the US that have been used fairly uncritically in the mass media.

Now, in an upcoming edition of Social Sciences Quarterly, 
  • Stephan J. Goetz, 
  • Anil Rupasingha, and 
    •
  • Scott Loveridge point out that the SPLC methodology leaves, ah, a bit to be desired.





  • The abstract:





  • Objective
    The recent surge in hate group activity is a concern to many citizens and policymakers. We examine the roles of socioeconomic factors measured at the county level that are hypothesized to account for the presence of such groups, including social capital and religious affiliations.
    Methods
    We estimate a Poisson regression model using counts of hate groups provided by the Southern Poverty Law Center for each of the over 3,000 U.S. counties. Our regressors include a wider set of variables than has been considered in previous studies, such as Jefferson and Pryor (1999).
    Results
    Our approach produces a better statistical fit than that in Jefferson and Pryor's paper, and the additional regressors contribute significantly to our understanding of hate groups.
    Conclusion
    Both social capital stocks and religious affiliation exert an independent and statistically significant influence on the number of hate groups, as does the presence of Wal-Mart stores, holding other factors constant.

    If you got it, give yourself a gold star and get back to work handing out that shopping cart.

    • Comments

    rkeefe57 said…
    The money clause comes at the end of this ridiculous study, in the Conclusion section:

    “However, our discovery of an association between Wal-Mart locations and hate groups could lead the corporation’s foundation to play a larger role in supporting the types of local groups that enhance the social capital index used in our analysis.”

    Looks like a typical shake-down to me. "We discovered that Wal-Marts cause "hate groups" and so they should pony up money for our pet causes."

    Below is a summary of some of the more egregious flaws in the methodology:

    There are several problems inherent in the Goetz & Company study from the get-go:

    1. There is no legal definition of "hate group," which is why even the FBI does not, cannot, designate hate groups.

    What exactly was Goetz studying then?

    2. The SPLC uses the deliberately meaningless term "hate group" in its fundraising materials because it allows them to denigrate any group without accusing them of any actual crimes.

    Without a legal definition, a "hate group" is anything the SPLC, a private fundraising organization, says it is.

    That's simply not good enough.

    3. For reasons known only to the authors, Goetz, et al, compared the number of "hate groups" on the SPLC's spurious 2007 map with the number of Wal-Mart stores in the US in 1998!

    What's up with that?

    If the authors had compared the number of "hate groups" claimed by the SPLC for 1998 there would have been almost half as many groups, which would completely skew their findings.

    So would comparing 2007 "hate group" numbers with 2007 Wal-Mart numbers because there were more than 1,000 more Wal-Marts around than in 1998, a 40% increase.

    As long as you're picking and choosing your data sets to fit your hypothesis in advance, why not compare 2007 "hate groups" with 1907 blacksmith shops and correlate the connection between "hate groups" and horses?

    But wait! There's more!!

    4. In 2008, the year the 2007 "hate group" data was collected, it turns out that 147 of the 926 alleged groups were not affiliated with any known city or town.

    These homeless "hate groups" simply float about in the SPLC's fundraising literature, padding the numbers.

    That's over 13% of the total. Is it possible that a 13% discrepancy is statistically insignificant?

    By 2010 the number of phantom groups had doubled to 26% and still stands at 1 in 4 today.

    http://wp.me/pCLYZ-cU

    5. Last October, the SPLC's public relations chief, Mark Potok, the man in charge of cooking up the SPLC's "hate group" numbers each year, admitted on camera that his numbers were "anecdotal," "a very rough estimate," and "an imperfect process."

    http://wp.me/pCLYZ-bc

    In the past, Potok has admitted in the press that his reports include "groups" that are nothing more than post office boxes and that his "Hate Map" fundraising tool "does not include original reporting by SPLC staff.”

    THIS is "hard data"??

    Maybe there is actually a correlation between "hate" and Wal-Marts or maybe not, but either way, picking and choosing the data sets that produce the desired results or relying on SPLC fundraising propaganda is a dismally poor way to go about proving it.
    April 16, 2012 at 11:50 AM
    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

    In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw
    18 comments
    Read more

    The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

    The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

    .....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici
    Post a Comment
    Read more